Skip to main content

The "Association and Dissociation" Technique and "The fear of Public Speaking"


The "Association and Dissociation" Technique

Benefits

  1. Neutralize Experiences of low to medium intensity.
  2. amplify the positive feeling or some positive experience that you had in the past.

This exercise is not recommended for traumatic experiences

Note : To understand this technique, we will perform an exercise. You don’t need any equipment to perform this exercise but it is expected of you to sit in a quiet place with minimal disturbances so that you can focus on this exercise.


Running Exercise


Sit straight with your spine and shoulders erect. Close your eyes.

Now imagine that you are seeing yourself running from a distance. i.e you are observing yourself running from far away. Well, you can imagine seeing yourself running on the road while you are sitting on a park bench.



How do you feel about it?

Most of you will probably feel nothing.

Now merge yourself with the object i.e imagine yourself running and observing through the eyes of a runner. You would have a completely different experience now. Can you imagine your heart pumping and your lungs expanding? Can you imagine your sweat dripping and stinging in your eyes? You could also imagine yourself being sore in your calves and thighs. Can you imagine that constant nudging in your heart that you feel when it is trying to make you stop will your mind is focused on completing your run?

How do you feel about it now? Was your experience any different than the previous one? Now open your eyes.

If your answer was yes then what do you think was the difference b/w the first case and the last case?

Well in the first case you were not connected to the object i.e you were dissociated from it and in the second case you imagined yourself being connected with it hence the state of association. In other words, Dissociation is disconnecting or separating from certain experiences and Association  is connecting with desirable experiences.

Now you might be wondering, How can this association and dissociation help me neutralize or amplify my experiences. You can amplify or neutralize any feeling by being associated or dissociated with it.

 

The Fear of Public Speaking

Let's take the fear of public speaking as an example. You know that this fear is very real. Even if you have worked very hard for this, the fear won't let you perform it brilliantly. Well, some amount of fear is good since it keeps you on your toes and alert but it is the excess of the fear of public speaking that hinders our performance. So let's see how we can dissociate it and make it less dominant. You must understand that fear will be there and it is good but its intensity will be reduced many folds.

Imagine "The fear of Public Speaking" as a cartoon character or a funny object that you would like to dissociate from.

The Working Idea to overcome the "Stage Fear"

The main idea here is to imagine it as an object so that we can dissociate from it. Imagine its image as big as possible right in front of your eyes, now you already know that you are associated with it. Now what you have to do is try to push the fear away from you slowly. Making it distant and smaller, don't stop till the time the fear is at a safe distance from you. Now you will realize that the fear levels have dropped significantly and your heartbeat which was earlier elevated is coming back to normal. I encourage you to try this next time you go for public speaking.

An alternative way to dissociate from this fear is to imagine it happening to someone else.When people who had gotten over their phobias were studied, it was discovered that every one of these people now thought of their phobia experience as it they were watching it happen to someone else(similar to the "Running exercise" when you were seeing yourself running while you were sitting on the park bench).



If you are new to this sort of content, I would like to tell you that it is good to be skeptical and not believing right away. Skepticism is the foundation for trust and some amazing discoveries but negating something without actually trying it is not skepticism, it is rather being naive. And being naive gets you nowhere. I would recommend the readers to be skeptic and not believe in what I say right away but try it for yourself 2-3 times with full dedication to see if these tricks work for you or not. But I would also recommend for you to not be naive and jump to conclusions without trying it so that people who are actually in need of these exercises don't get demotivated by your hatred.

If you found the content insightful, subscribe for more content like this. I ll meet you next week with a new blog. Peace!!

Comments

  1. Awesome
    Got something new today

    ReplyDelete
  2. Nice article. Must try the tricks. Might work on few.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Smells good, I will definitely try this

    ReplyDelete
  4. There's a quote, courage is not the absence of fear, but the knowledge that there's something more important worth doing. That's helped me when I'm onstage, I intend on giving your advice a try as well.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That is a very powerful quote! Thanks for sharing it!

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

How to give Feedback when stakes are high?

I don’t want to hurt him/her. But he/she needs to know this because this is affecting his/her relationship with me and other people around us. Have you ever been in a similar situation and wondered if there is a warmer way to do it without hurting the person. Yes, there is a way to give honest feedback without hurting the person in front. To learn this way, we will first understand the “Gain-Loss principle” given by Elliot Aaronson and Darwyn Linder based on the results of an experiment conducted by them in the year 1965 first. The experiment: In this experiment, people who volunteered as the subject were interviewed by a confederate(Someone who assists in a plot) of the experiment. Then in this experiment, the subject would overhear the conversation between the confederate and the researcher where the confederate would describe the subject to the researcher. The Description of the subject was always one of the four mentioned below: 1.              Positive: The description wa

Are you being manipulated to believe in Astrology?

To understand this, let us first talk about the “ Confirmation bias ” and the “ Egocentric bias ”.   Confirmations Bias: The tendency of people to seek confirmation of their current beliefs and impressions.                People generally tend to ignore the things that are against their current beliefs and tend to stick with the ones that support their belief system. That is people try to absorb only the information which fits in with the information they currently have. This could be seen with the fact that people generally marry their spouses who have a similar mindset and depart from the relationships where their beliefs are being questioned and challenged.   Egocentric bias: People relate more to situations and stigmas that apply to them than the ones that aren’t.                     People tend to keep themselves at the centre of the universe. That is people remember new information better when they can apply it to themselves and tend to ignore/forget if they t

How to motivate yourself?

Have you ever set a goal where you were really motivated at the start and eventually lost the interest/motivation to pursue it? This habit is not only hindering your goals but also decreasing your confidence in yourself. When the frequency of non-fulfillment of goals is increased, your sense of self-worth suffers, and you start thinking that maybe you’re not made for that work or maybe you are just an average human who is not made for non-average things. Today we will talk about a better way to commit to your goals. If this doesn’t work for you, it doesn’t mean that you are not good enough perhaps you need to understand that same jabs and hooks don’t work for all boxers and you should rather try to find the ones that suit your style. To understand this technique, we must first understand the experiment which proved its effectiveness. The Experiment: This Experiment was conducted by two renowned psychologists Morton Deutsch and Harold Gerald in 1995 . In this experiment, the parti

Emotional Intelligence: Acknowledging the Irrational/Emotional Side of our Brain

“Why do I become so irrational during discussions?” “Why do I get so anxious over things so simple?” “Seriously! What was I even thinking?”   Have you often noticed yourself asking these questions? If yes, then you have come to the right place. Today we will talk about why we behave irrationally under emotions. Before understanding why and how this happens, let’s delve a little into how our brain works.   The Brain: We will not go into the intricacies of our brain. The only parts of the brain that concerns us are the Frontal lobe and the limbic part of the brain. The Frontal lobe is responsible for the rational/logical decisions that we take while the limbic part of the brain is responsible for our behavioral and emotional responses. The limbic part is more primitive while the frontal lobe is a newly formed part of the brain. The limbic part is responsible for emotional memories. It controls how you process strong emotions like fear and pleasure. During various experi

How to not worry/panic/procrastinate?

In often every conversation, you will hear people saying things like “Don’t worry about it” or “Don’t Panic”. Consider this, if I ask you to not imagine a “A cute Panda”, what would immediately happen? You will imagine it right away. Despite listening to what I said, you will still imagine the Panda. The same thing happens when we say   “I won’t procrastinate today”, our brains do not know how to process the negative language. Instead of not doing what we are asked not to do, we do it. Have you ever been in a moment where you said “I won’t do this, this is destroying my health/wealth/reputation” and you end up doing it right away? Take the case where you say “I won’t panic” and you end up panicking a lot. What happens is you end up panicking about what would happen if you would panic, so you end up panicking about “Not Panicking”. This is what Mark Manson in his book “The Subtle Art of not giving a F*ck” referred to as the “Feedback loop from Hell” where you worry about the possi